64 TRB references, 38 live items. Rate each for priority and impact — your ratings set the order we scope them in.
Why you're rating. These ratings decide which opportunities go forward first to a detailed scope of work. They set scoping order — they don't commit budget or delivery.
Ordered by Macro's impact assessment (Compliance 35% · Financial 25% · Client 20% · Strategic 15% · Colleague QoL 5%). Sort or filter by any dimension.
Open a row for the full discovery record and to change a rating. Team is the in-app view — rate priority and impact 1–5 with the dots.
What this list is
The TRB register (28 Aug) with Macro's portfolio impact assessment. Ordering follows Macro's weighted score;
the in-app team rating sits alongside it as the people's view. Foundation counts the data an item needs to already exist against the foundation it builds —
an item needing four things and building one depends on data nobody has created yet. Hover either number to see which entities.
Refs are Macro's TRB numbers, so gaps and exclusions are theirs. Effort and beta estimates, where present, size a first working slice
in a multinational — not a company-wide rollout.
Everything the improvement programme reads from or produces — data sets, reports, scorecards, pricing, integration flows. Have = exists and we can reach it · Mock = built by us on illustrative data · Hunting = known to exist, source being chased · Missing = nobody has it yet. Amber cells are the unknowns; everything saves automatically.
WhoClient→Contract SupplierPerson
Surrey Council = Client · the engagement = Contract